This is STAGING. For front-end user testing and QA.
The Chronicle of Philanthropy logo

News

Evaluations Are Useless if Groups Ignore the Results; Plus More: Tuesday’s Roundup

May 18, 2010 | Read Time: 1 minute

  • Louisa Hackett of the Community Resource Exchange, a nonprofit group in New York, discusses a recent New Yorker article on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Poverty Action Lab and says that evaluations are only useful if organizations are prepared to listen to the results.
  • Emily Robbins of PhilanTopic writes about a recent discussion of the trends reshaping philanthropy with Steve Gunderson, the Council on Foundation’s president; consultant Lucy Bernholz; Diana Iviv of Independent Sector; and Stanford University professor Robert Reich. Watch a video of the event.
  • Most donors will not make a donation without visiting a nonprofit group’s Web site first, writes Jocelyn Harmon, director of nonprofit services at Care2. On the blog Marketing for Nonprofits, Ms. Harmon offers tips on how nonprofit groups can strengthen their Web presence, noting that the majority of online donations in 2008, which was around $15-billion, came in through charities’ Web sites.
  • Social-media experts Beth Kanter and Allison Fine discuss how the nonprofit group Students for a Free Tibet uses social media to spread its messages. The organization was a winner in the first and second America’s Giving Challenge.


ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.

About the Author

Senior Editor

Maria directs the Chronicle of Philanthropy’s annual Philanthropy 50, a comprehensive report on America’s most generous donors. She writes about wealthy philanthropists, family and legacy foundations, next generation philanthropy, arts organizations, key trends and insights related to high-net-worth donors, and other topics.